Bulios Academy Investor psychology: the biggest risk is in the mirror

Investing Basics

Investor psychology: the biggest risk is in the mirror

A retail investor's results are decided more by emotions than by stock picking. FOMO, panic, anchoring, herding and confirmation bias - and the process that protects you from them.

What you will take away

  • FOMO pushes you to buy what has already risen - which means expensive and without any reasoning of your own
  • Panic selling turns a temporary decline into a permanent loss; people sell at the bottom because that is where fear is greatest
  • Anchoring to your purchase price and herding are natural instincts that work against you in the markets
  • Confirmation bias makes you seek out only the information that confirms what you already think
  • The protection is not willpower but process: an investment plan, a journal and rules set calmly in advance

If investment results were decided by knowledge alone, economists would win in the markets. They do not. The difference between a successful and an unsuccessful retail investor is far more often made by behavior than by cleverness: the ability not to make five predictable mistakes in five critical moments. The human brain evolved for survival in a tribe, not for trading on an exchange - and the instincts that once protected us do systematic damage in the markets. This article describes the five most expensive ones and, above all, the way to protect yourself against them.

FOMO: the fear that the train is leaving without you

FOMO (fear of missing out) is a feeling you know: some stock is everywhere. A colleague brags about how much he made on it, the headlines keep adding zeros, and you are the only one standing aside. The pressure grows with every day of gains, until one day you simply click the buy button - not because you understand the company, but because you could not stand it any longer.

The problem lies in the timing FOMO forces on you: you buy after a big run-up, which means expensive, and often close to the moment when enthusiasm peaks. When the price then falls, you have nothing to hold on to - no reasoning of your own for why you own the stock and what you expect from it. You are holding someone else's enthusiasm bought at the highest price. A useful test: if the main reason for buying is that the price is rising and others are making money, that is not an investment thesis, it is FOMO.

Panic selling: how a decline becomes a loss

The mirror twin of FOMO is panic selling. The market drops twenty percent, the news reports a crisis, the portfolio bleeds red every day. Every evening you tell yourself you will hold on - and one morning, usually after a particularly dark headline, you sell everything. The relief is immediate. And usually very expensive.

A decline on paper is not yet a loss; it only becomes one through selling. And panic has treacherous timing: the strongest fear arrives near the bottom, because that is where the news is worst and the declines have lasted longest. Whoever sells in a panic will very likely sell close to the bottom - and returns to the market only once it feels safe again, that is, at higher prices. Selling at the bottom and buying back after the recovery is the most reliable recipe for losing money in the markets even during a period when the market ultimately went up.

Anchoring: the purchase price as a prison

Anchoring is the tendency to latch on to a single number - for an investor, almost always the purchase price. You bought a stock at 100, it now trades at 70, and you wait for it to return to 100 so you can sell without a loss. It sounds reasonable, but the reasoning rests on nothing: the market does not know your purchase price and does not care. A stock does not return to 100 because that is what you paid for it.

The anchor then distorts decisions in both directions. You hold a bad investment for years just to avoid admitting the loss - even though the money could have long been working elsewhere. And a good investment you sell the moment it returns to your purchase price, with relief and a zero, even though the reasons to keep owning it still stand. The right question is never what you paid. It is: would I buy this stock today, at today's price and with today's information? If yes, hold. If no, the purchase price changes nothing.

Herding: the safety of the crowd is an illusion

Herding is the instinct to do what everyone else is doing. In prehistoric times it made sense - whoever stayed with the tribe survived. In the markets it works in reverse: when everyone is buying, prices are high, and when everyone is selling, they are low. The crowd thus systematically leads you to buy expensive and sell cheap - and on top of that it gives you the pleasant feeling of doing the right thing, because after all, everyone is doing it.

A typical real-life example: at a family celebration investing becomes topic number one, your brother-in-law and your neighbor are buying stocks, and not buying feels strange. Historically, exactly these moments - when the investment fever cannot be escaped even at Sunday lunch - have tended to be closer to the top than to the bottom. That does not automatically mean betting against the crowd; it means that an investment's popularity is no proof of its quality, and the feeling of safety in a crowd is the most expensive feeling in the markets.

Confirmation bias: you hear only what you want to hear

Confirmation bias is the tendency to seek out and believe information that confirms what we already think - and to overlook the rest. An investor who has bought a stock reads enthusiastic analyses and comments from equally convinced holders; warning signals get dismissed with the claim that the author does not understand the company. Every agreeing opinion strengthens their certainty, every dissenting one only convinces them that others just do not get it. The result is an investor who grows ever more convinced - while holding no more information, only more confirmation.

The defense is uncomfortable but simple: actively look for counterarguments. Before buying, try writing down the strongest reasons the investment might not work out. If you cannot find any, it is not because they do not exist - you just have not wanted to see them yet.

Protection: process instead of willpower

The bad news: these five tendencies do not vanish just because you know about them. They are wired deep, and in an emotionally charged moment they overrule even an educated investor. The good news: you do not need to defeat them with willpower. It is enough to build a process that decides for you - calmly and in advance, not in the middle of the storm.

  • An investment plan. A short document written in a calm moment: why you invest, for how long, how much per month and into what. When the market falls, you will not be making decisions - you will just read what you calmly planned, and carry on.
  • Rules set in advance. Every decision that can be made ahead of time, make ahead of time: under what conditions you will buy more, under what conditions you will sell, how large a single position may be. A rule created before a crisis is reason; a decision made in the middle of one is emotion in disguise.
  • An investment journal. A few sentences with every purchase: why I am buying, what I expect, what would make me sell. The journal confronts you with your own past reasoning, stops memory from rewriting history - and after a year of keeping it you will see your behavioral patterns in black and white.
  • Automation. The best decision is the one you do not have to make. Regular automatic investing, which we cover in the article on regular investing, takes emotions out of the entire execution. And instead of staring at your portfolio daily, price alerts will serve you well - you learn what you need to know without exposing yourself to the temptation to react to every move.

Boredom is a good sign

To close, a yardstick that will save you a lot of money: well-set-up investing is boring. No adrenaline trades, no late-night chart watching, no stories for colleagues. Just the same amount, the same day of the month, year after year. Excitement in the markets is usually a symptom of gambling, not investing - and if your portfolio entertains you like a casino, it probably behaves like one too. When one day you realize you have not looked at your portfolio in weeks and do not miss it at all, that will not be a failure. It will be a sign that your emotions are finally working for you - which is to say, nowhere near your investment decisions.

We use essential cookies to run the website and optional analytics cookies to measure usage. See our Privacy Policy.